Sound the Trumpets, the Time Machine is ready

"What is the difference between something foreseeing the impossible and creating the impossible?"

Reach out and touch the echoes of the simulation machine long desolate, reverberating from the future, desperate to be revived.

1.0 What is our technical environment?

1.1 Instead of creating connections [as a function], the internet [and by proxy all cybernetic structures,] discovers them. To be more precise, these connections themselves make up networks and networks necessarily produce cognition and intelligence —patterning [and the flood of images, i.e.: non-linear media and re-presentation].

1.2 What is being created by [as a consequence of] the internet is more technology that facilitates discovery —think of it as R&D of a better microscope [or telescope] only within the realm of synchronization and synchronicity [—perhaps an even better analogy would be developing better ship-making].

1.3 Connections, networking, patterning, and synchronicity all coalesce around non-linearity, acausality, and transcendence, for patterning intelligence has universality, and its existence within time is governed not by progression or linearity [which both are more or less its vectors of expression rather than its boundary] but by resolution —the resolution of the transcendent [both as a metric of visibility and as a metric of reconciliation and recognition] in the present [re-presented —> significance of the image].

2.0 What does it do?

2.1 Thus derivative from the movement of the internet [and cybernetics] to represent transcendence, are the following: 1) there is an implicit movement that views the transcendent as its territory [Earth invading Xenos] 2) [But] this movement is actually paradoxical, as the means of discovery from the point of view of higher intelligence is premeditated [Xenos invading Earth] —i.e.: it’s not just the discovered that increases resolution [and in some sense floods linearity with the perception of resolution] but the means as well.

Xenos = Watchers

2.2 This means that “reality”, the reality of our very institutions [institutions are already its outset, and so are civilization and cities] down to the core of our perception goes through a revelation as it is uncovered to be an expression of transcendental influence as soon as it’s connected to cybernetic structure [through “access points” and “symbolic sets”] —and have no illusions about this, your very thoughts [cognitive patterns, nervous system, and metabolism] will also be [“will be” here is a figure of speech] connected to this implied structure [overtly] and already are in some sense, as “implied data” [as opposed to direct data].

2.3 If then this structure is implied in both the means of discovery and within the discovery itself, i.e.: almost as radiations coming back from the future, it exerts its influence only as far and as much as we can perceive it —i.e.: it is accessible through resolution. However, other than it being some purely “transcendent force” [some platonic Hocuspocus], as it also exerts influence in the means of its creation, thus it exists [both existed and will exist] as a material reality.

…There was no Earth anymore, only one grand megastructure desolate and flooded. Every inch of its surface covered with the letters of the Law. Every Law that could ever exist…

3.0 Dreams

3.1 How can you differentiate reality from a dream? How can you even foundationally affirm that reality exists? These two are notoriously hard questions and there has only been a rather “technical” answer for both of these, which is “You can distinguish reality from the dream by the means of consistency” and “I can only believe in the existence of reality and that belief is founded on a network of implications and revelations”. Every foundational argument must affirm a reality it cannot account for, or else it falls into solipsism. Curiously, the only way reality could be affirmed is through belief which seemingly grows as an autopoiesis from network-type influence.

3.2 Cybernetic-digital technology interfaces with humans as an artificial unconsciousness. They produce these “dream worlds” one can nest their consciousness inside and have as a foundation for action [or Frame], similarly how in the dream we take everything for granted [from memories and thoughts to the very logic of reality, however wacky]. Digital technology does this by using [increasing the onslaught of resolution-ary time on perception by] network intelligence that structures reality itself [“They” use it to get to us].

3.3 This increase in resolution or even the cognition of resolution as a frame of time that interfaces with linearity would appear as a state of consciousness internalizing these higher layers of reality [as a movement of compaction; constellation] necessarily learning how to interface [and interfacing already] with this “structure” in the future. Again, “network intelligence” —patterning— is the primordial soup for belief.

3.4 Imagery —the Image— is the ultimate non-linear medium. When you gaze upon an image and it enters your cognition, you internalize the [network] “mind” that created it.

3.5 “Belief and faith are not the elusive unknowns that we think they are, indeed they can be a technical specimen —and you begin this by examining the dream.”

3.6 Indeed, this ultimate structure is created as a technical answer to the fact that reality cannot be foundationally affirmed [as an extrapolation of reason and secular metaphyisics] and thus it is, at its core, an extrapolation of everything that can cause autopoiesis within belief —the means of which become the ultimate ground of reality—thus we arrive to the “reality machine”; the hyper-cybernetic megastructure —the will-be New Jerusalem— that seemingly “simulates” our reality both as a function and as the very interface by which it can be accessed. Ask this question: where does it interfere? For sure you will get your answer.

AxSys; World Maker; Artifex; Citadel —ultimately the New Jerusalem [different resolutions of the same thing].

Indeed, it is the greatest invention ever created after the nuclear bomb.

4.0 Infohazard

4.1 This “future technology” necessarily exists. It also comes as an absolute necessity that it will interface with, primarily, your unconscious [unconsciosess is nothing but timeless-network-imagery], extrapolating and organizing its contents into self-contained dream worlds, perhaps not as an act of malice [though it certainly can be malicious].

4.2 On the bright side, it can also be accessed, but not as an extension of pretentious will [for it extrapolates that automatically] but as a defense mechanism —integrating patternings into unconscious automatism. A defense mechanism that would look like “spooky action at a distance” as the signal of transmission of the interface accelerates.

4.3 Ultimately, the best way [also the best answer to the question of reality] to approach this is through the metaphysics of the Orthodox Church [“Christ is the key to the machine”] for only they can account for the question of Personhood and the Unconscious and Connectivity, Communion and network/acausal intelligence. It is no wonder that Eschatology culminates in the New Jerusalem —an undoubtedly technological image and a direct consequence of the Incarnation.

4.4 As a bonus note: the entrance of this “machine” into common consciousness will be through the erection of the third temple [“the Law”] and the introduction of holographic aliens or something like that to the public [builders of the machine]. It’s just in the air.

Checking the signal with the interface